are refering to a warrior and its a 19 twink I
Posted on | February 8, 2010 | No Comments
Now in this is your flavor ofhoe. Sie we are refering to a warrior and it’s a 19 twink I say stk with the 4 following ehants for weps for melee wise is the following. (+15agil,lifesteal,fiery or even the plus damage to wep.)Nowrusader is not bad at all. However, the pr rate is not worth it imo. Plus I am not entirely sure if this is true or not now. But by past threads from what I’ve been reading, they put a lvl req onrusader but I’m not sure if this is true or not.When I get off work, I’llhk my ehanter to see if it is true or not or if someone elseould verify that. Link to this D 18th 2007 6:19pm : Logged Reply to this Lorimathholar2137 Default
I didn’t twink my Druid to pwn nubs. I twinked my druid so Iould tuallyompete. Maybe you haven’t seen lower level battlegrounds rently, but there are just as many twinks as non-twinks if not more. I don’t see the differee in twinking at 49 and twinking at 70. I mean, a full S3 geared player with high end ehants vs a fresh 70 is a mh bigger hurdle than a twinked 39 and a non-twinked 39 (now those underlevelled players, that’s another story). I know itan be frustrating to get killed by twinks. That’s why I made one. To be able to kill them bk. It’s not that I don’t like 70 pvp, my warrior does tons of it. It’s just that sometimes it is more fun to kk bk with a group of players that all have max gear for their level that is mh easier to obtain. I spent about 10 hours twinking my druid at 49. I spend more time than that getting a single upgrade at 70.
Comments
Leave a Reply